Is the T-72 better than the Abrams?
Regarding protection capabilities, the Abrams tank is generally considered to have a significant advantage over the T-72, particularly against modern anti-tank weapons.
On the other hand, the Abrams tank is a more advanced and modern tank that is highly mobile, well-protected, and equipped with advanced sensors and computer systems. It has superior firepower, mobility, and crew comfort compared to the T-72 but is also more expensive and complex to operate and maintain.
With a range of 290 miles, the T-72 can travel slightly further than the M1's 265 miles before refueling – though it's also 10 tons lighter than the American tank, which is outfitted with heavier armor for better survivability.
While the M1A2 Abrams has a slightly larger main cannon, the T-14 Armata's autoloader system allows for a faster rate of fire. Ultimately, both tanks are capable of delivering devastating firepower on the battlefield.
Depending on the model, an Abrams can weigh between 67.6 and 73.6 tons, but the T-72s are considerably lighter at around 45 tons.
The original T-72 firing against the original M1 Abrams 105mm version might penetrate at close range, whereas firing against an M1A1 or later would likely result in no penetration.
Of the nine Abrams tanks destroyed, seven were destroyed by friendly fire and two intentionally destroyed to prevent capture by the Iraqi Army. No M1s were lost to enemy tank fire. Some others took minor combat damage, with little effect on their operational readiness.
The main problems of T-72 are a weak gun by modern standards, insufficient armour, outdated night vision system, small gun lifting angle. But the main problem is bad placement of ammunition. That is why in most cases when the armor in T-72 is damaged, the tank “loses its head”, clear thing, together with the crew.
Military expert Lt Col JS Sodhi told EurAsian Times, “The T-14 Armata is technologically superior to the M1 Abrams and the Leopard tanks. T-14 has a maximum operating range of 310 miles compared to 265 miles for Abrams and 210 miles for a Leopard.
Because of a lower weight than T-72 (by ~3 tonnes), T-64 has slightly superior strategic and operational mobility (less wear and tear on tank transportation equipment, and lower fuel consumption per distance traveled.
Can a Russian tank beat an Abrams?
Even in export versions, the Abrams M1A2 SEP v. 2 variant significantly outperforms any Russian production tank (the newest is the T-90M, the Armata has not yet gone into a large series),” Pukhov was quoted as saying by the Russian newspaper Moskovsky Komsomolets.
1. The South Korean K2 Black Panther.

The new main battle tank is called AbramsX.
"AbramsX: A main battle tank for the next generation, the AbramsX technology demonstrator features reduced weight for improved mobility and transportability, delivering the same tactical range as the M1A2 Abrams with 50% less fuel consumption.
Several T-72 models featured explosive reactive armour (ERA), which increased protection primarily against high-explosive anti-tank (HEAT) type weapons.
The M1 Abrams tank is among the most powerful ground weapons in the U.S. arsenal, able to close in on enemy tanks, troop positions and other targets, blast them with its cannon and machine guns, and then speed away.
It is designed to destroy tanks and other armoured targets or enemy troops. It is equipped with a 125 mm cannon with a smooth barrel having the range of fire of 4,500 meters.
It's very unlikely that a lone T-72 could manage to destroy a modern Abrams in the sense that it damages the vehicle to the point where it would have to be replaced rather than repaired.
The latest T-72 model is the T-72B4 (or T-72B3M) which is good enough to knock out a M1A2 Abrams SEP v.
However, the T-72's armor and fire control systems were less advanced compared to the M1A1 Abrams, making it more vulnerable to enemy fire. The M1A1 Abrams holds a distinct edge over the T-72 family of tanks in various aspects, making it a more formidable opponent on the battlefield.
A total of 23 M1A1s were damaged or destroyed during the war. Of the nine Abrams tanks destroyed, seven were destroyed by friendly fire and two intentionally destroyed to prevent capture by the Iraqi Army. Some others took minor combat damage, with little effect on their operational readiness.
How many Abrams did the US lose in the Gulf war?
Of the nine Abrams destroyed, seven were due to friendly fire, and two were intentionally destroyed to prevent capture after they became disabled. Sim- ilarly, of the 28 Bradleys destroyed or damaged, 20 were due to friendly fire.
Just over 2,000 Abrams tanks were deployed with combat units during the war, and only 23 were damaged or destroyed.
The Russians have lost potentially two-thirds of the T-72s that are in active service or in recoverable storage. So it makes a lot more sense why the Kremlin is pulling out of storage T-62 tanks that are even older than any T-72 is, as well as T-80Bs that are roughly contemporaneous with early T-72s.
What was the hardest tank to destroy? The king tiger. It had 100 mm of armour on the front, 80 mm on the side, and 80 mm on the rear. It could still be penned by rockets and heat rounds, but its 88 mm gun was capable of killing basically everything the allies could throw at it.
Tank | |
---|---|
#1. Freemax Fireluke 4 | Buy Now |
#2. nexMesh Pro | Buy Now |
#3. Aquila | Buy Now |
#4. Sakerz Master | Buy Now |
Can a Javelin destroy an Abrams tank? Short answer is yes. The Javelin can pretty much destroy any main battle tank today as it is a top attack weapon, so it attacks the armor at the thinnest spot possible on any tank.
If you're meaning as in knocking it out of action, there's actually a few ATGMs and air-launched anti-tank missiles that can do that, and especially those with top attack modes like Javelin. Hit the engine or make the ammo rack burst and it's a mobility and mission kill respectively.
The Soviet KV-2. Put simply, there is no world in which any WW2-era tank gets into a situation where it could perforate an M1s armor. Your only hope is that the sheer explosive force of a large high-explosive projectile disables the Abrams. That's where the 152mm M-10T howitzer comes in.
The T-80 is a faster, more heavily armored tank than the T-72. The T-80 is powered by a gasoline turbine engine that gives the tank a ground speed in excess of 40 miles per hour. The tank is equipped with the Kobra missile system and can fire an antitank missile through its 125mm smoothbore gun.
The T-62 is less complex to operate and requires less maintenance than the T-72, making it an optimal choice to introduce for militia units, and potentially in future for conscript units in the Russian Army itself.
Is the T-90 just an upgraded T-72?
What's the difference between the Russian T-72 and T-90 tanks? OK, so first of all, the T-90 is a modernisation of the T-72B, which is a modernisation of the T-72A, which (surprise!) is a modernisation of the T-72.
It is designed to withstand a variety of threats, including armor-piercing rounds, anti-tank missiles, and improvised explosive devices (IEDs). That being said, destroying an Abrams tank is not an easy task. It would require a significant amount of firepower and/or a well-planned attack strategy.
Can an RPG penetrate an Abrams tank? As a matter of fact, the RPGs 29, 30 and 32, armed with tandem-charge, were primarily designed to defeat western modern reactive armor. As such, they are capable of penetrating even the frontal hull of an Abrams MBT.
If it is lucky enough to hit the Abrams, there is a good chance it will win the fight.
The new Russian T-14 Armata main battle tank (MBT), dubbed the “world's deadliest tank,” has been making headlines ever since its first public appearance during this year's May 9 Victory parade in Moscow.
The Abrams Main Battle Tank closes with and destroys the enemy using mobility, firepower, and shock effect. The Abrams is a full-tracked, low-profile, land combat assault weapon enabling expeditionary Warfighters to dominate their adversaries through lethal firepower, unparalleled survivability, and audacious maneuver.
The Tiger I ( listen (help. info)) was a German heavy tank of World War II that operated beginning in 1942 in Africa and in the Soviet Union, usually in independent heavy tank battalions. It gave the German Army its first armoured fighting vehicle that mounted the 8.8 cm KwK 36 gun (derived from the 8.8 cm Flak 36).
The U.S. worried that the fuel demands would create a logistical nightmare for Ukrainian forces. While an Abrams can storm through the snow and mud, fuel trucks can't. In addition, like any jet engine, the Abrams' turbine needs air to breathe, which it sucks in through filtered rear vents.
It's the M1A2 Abrams, named for Vietnam-era General Creighton Abrams. While other Western nations let their arms industries decay after the Soviet Union's collapse, the U.S. Army continued upgrading the Abrams.
The capabilities of T-72s can vary very widely, with the old baseline T-72 which first entered service in 1973 being totally obsolete today, while the latest unnamed variant which appears to have been developed during the Russian-Ukrainian War features armour protection that is among the very best Russia has ever put ...
Is Russia running out of tank crews?
Kovalenko noted Russia's growing shortage of good tank crews when he tracked a batch of a dozen restored T-72s, T-80s and T-90s reaching a Russian army motorized unit near Svatove in eastern Ukraine. "The most interesting thing is that there are no crews in the unit who can operate these tanks," Kovalenko said.
There are several differences in design philosophy between Russian, German and American tanks. A major one is in the turret. Russia favors autoloading guns, removing one crewman from the turret, allowing for a crew of three. This also allows a smaller and harder to hit turret.
M1A2 Abrams: Simply the Best Tank on the Planet: In the M1A2 Abrams main battle tank, the U.S. military possesses one of the most capable tanks in the market. The M1A2 Abrams Manufactured by General Dynamics Land Systems, the M1A2 Abrams is one of the most advanced main battle tanks in the world.
Unlike other tanks that use diesel, the Abrams has a jet turbine engine that guzzles JP-8 jet fuel, which is more expensive and harder to maintain. They are also tricky to maintain, and any crew error could trigger the engine to blow.
Advanced modern tanks like the Abrams don't have air conditioning for the crew. (Though the latest model has a "Thermal Management System" to keep the computers cool in the desert.)
T-72 Tank — $1,200,000.
Name | Country of origin | Quantity |
---|---|---|
T-62 | Soviet Union | 100 |
WZ-121/Type 69 | China | 100 |
T-72 | Soviet Union | 100 |
Lion of Babylon (tank) | Iraq | 100 |
It is about to do so in the realm of land combat. The tank cannon has a maximum effective range of about 3000 meters, and precise aim is required to make a hit.
During the first Gulf War three kinetic energy piercing rounds from a T-72 hit the M1A1 armor but unable to fully penetrate but the external damage was enough to send the Abrams to get repaired. Six other M1A1s were allegedly hit by 125 mm tank fire, but the impacts were largely ineffectual.
The T-72 is the most widely used main battle tank in the world. It has been manufactured in six countries, is in service with the armies of 35 nations and has fought in all the major wars of the last 20 years. The striking feature of T-72 is the low profile.
What tank will replace M1 Abrams?
The new main battle tank is called AbramsX.
"AbramsX: A main battle tank for the next generation, the AbramsX technology demonstrator features reduced weight for improved mobility and transportability, delivering the same tactical range as the M1A2 Abrams with 50% less fuel consumption.
The main problems of T-72 are a weak gun by modern standards, insufficient armour, outdated night vision system, small gun lifting angle. But the main problem is bad placement of ammunition.
While much has been made of the T-14 Armata's cutting edge technology, including its active protection, 12-round per minute firing rage and 125mm smoothbore cannon in numerous public reports and assessments, it is not at all clear that the T-14 in any way fully outmatches current and future variants of the Abrams tank ...
It's the M1A2 Abrams, named for Vietnam-era General Creighton Abrams.
The PT-91 Twardy also features several upgrades over the T-72, including improved composite armour and explosive reactive armour (ERA), a modern fire control system with thermal imaging sights, a laser rangefinder, and a computerized fire control system.
What is interesting in this vid is that crew is painfully knowing the Achilles' heel of T-72 type of tanks! You can't reverse off from battle due the 4km/h reversing speed - have to turn your weak behind to ENY. Turret possiton to rear prevents to effectively return to fire.
The T-80 is a faster, more heavily armored tank than the T-72. The T-80 is powered by a gasoline turbine engine that gives the tank a ground speed in excess of 40 miles per hour. The tank is equipped with the Kobra missile system and can fire an antitank missile through its 125mm smoothbore gun.
Russia's tanks are inferior to the M1 Abrams that the US is sending to Ukraine, according to a top Russian defense expert. In addition, Russia is short of modern anti-tank missiles and armor-piercing shells for tank cannons that are needed to defeat the Abrams and other Western tanks.
Can a Javelin penetrate an Abrams? The Javelin has a range of up to 2.7 miles with an 18-pound tandem warhead (two shaped charges, one to pierce reactive armor the other to wreak havoc) and designed to penetrate even the toughest armor — including the skin of the Pentagon's beloved M1 Abrams tank.
Since most of the readily available RPG-7 rounds cannot penetrate M1 Abrams tank armor from almost any angle, it is primarily effective against soft-skinned or lightly armored vehicles, and infantry.
Is the army getting rid of tanks?
Goodbye, tanks: How the Marine Corps will change, and what it will lose, by ditching its armor. One year ago, the top Marine announced the first official steps of a major Marine Corps overhaul to shift to a Navy-centric warfighting role that would see many changes. The most noticeable? The elimination of Marine tanks.
While tanks have been declared obsolete many times since their first use in the Battle of the Somme in 1916, the latest high-tech upgrades to the legendary M1 Abrams make it more reliable, effective and lethal, allowing the Abrams to be a key asset in the land portion of the evolving multidomain battle. It can't fly.
References
- https://www.operationmilitarykids.org/f16-vs-f35-differences/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_combat_losses_of_United_States_military_aircraft_since_the_Vietnam_War
- https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-makes-the-m1-abrams-so-critical-to-the-russia-ukraine-war-11674654487
- https://man.fas.org/dod-101/sys/land/docs/4lastmbt.pdf
- https://www.statista.com/statistics/584286/number-of-military-personnel-in-nato-countries/
- https://defensebridge.com/article/comparing-the-m1a2-abrams-and-t-14-armata-a-detailed-analysis.html
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico%E2%80%93Russia_relations
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket-propelled_grenade
- https://www.advantour.com/russia/emblem.htm
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_Mexicans
- https://www.britannica.com/place/Moscow/History
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sochi
- https://www.quora.com/What-did-the-Roman-empire-know-of-Russia
- https://osgamers.com/frequently-asked-questions/can-an-rpg-penetrate-an-abrams-tank
- https://www.britannica.com/place/Moscow/People
- https://www.britannica.com/place/Moscow
- https://rusmania.com/central/belgorod-region/belgorod
- https://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/how-many-t72-russia-10000
- https://www.history.navy.mil/content/history/museums/nnam/explore/collections/aircraft/m/mig-15.html
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Russian_(cocktail)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_diaspora
- https://osgamers.com/frequently-asked-questions/what-was-the-hardest-tank-to-destroy
- https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/18/world/europe/fighter-jet-f16-ukraine.html
- https://www.quora.com/Can-a-T-90-tank-destroy-an-Abrams-tank-If-so-how-long-would-it-take
- https://www.airandspaceforces.com/ukraine-russia-putin-air-defenses-opinion/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_relations_of_Mexico
- https://geopoliticalfutures.com/why-mexico-belongs-in-north-america/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-64
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_America_under_Mexican_rule
- https://theworld.org/stories/2016-03-10/there-are-more-20-towns-america-called-moscow-why
- https://www.history.com/news/mexico-world-war-ii-surprising-involvement
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Central_America
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Soviet_Russia_and_the_Soviet_Union_(1917%E2%80%931927)
- https://www.realcleardefense.com/2022/12/31/why_the_m1_abrams_is_the_best_tank_on_earth_873132.html
- https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/what-would-happen-if-ukraine-joined-nato-2023-07-05/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z_(military_symbol)
- https://www.dictionary.com/browse/oblast
- https://theglobalamericans.org/2022/04/colombia-was-named-a-major-non-nato-ally-now-its-mexicos-turn/
- https://www.productplan.com/glossary/moscow-prioritization/
- https://www.ameredia.com/resources/demographics/russian.html
- https://www.newsweek.com/russia-su35-fighter-jet-ukraine-f16-1801830
- https://www.haaretz.com/archaeology/2013-10-15/ty-article/.premium/how-zayin-came-to-mean-arms-and-penis/0000017f-efa7-dc28-a17f-ffb7ab090000
- https://www.statista.com/statistics/1293754/nato-aircraft-strength-type/
- https://twitter.com/MMaenpaa1/status/1528442742183018496
- https://aviationweek.com/defense-space/aircraft-propulsion/russian-aircraft-losses-total-176-ukraine-raf-chief
- https://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/t62-variant-thermals-ukraine
- https://libraries.wsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/files/paul_brians/palouse/moscow/index.html
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Petersburg
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_M1_Abrams
- https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-country/rus/partner/mex
- https://science.howstuffworks.com/t-80-main-battle-tank.htm
- https://www.britannica.com/place/Cathay-medieval-region-China
- https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/can-russia%E2%80%99s-t-14-armata-beat-america%E2%80%99s-mighty-m1-abrams-tank-173217
- https://www.quora.com/How-true-is-it-that-the-T-90-is-an-upgrade-of-the-T-72-rather-than-an-entirely-new-design
- https://www.thomasnet.com/insights/5-most-powerful-battle-tanks-around-the-world/
- https://www.selinawamucii.com/insights/prices/russia/rice/
- https://www.ci.moscow.id.us/389/History
- https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_50336.htm
- https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/05/22/7403221/
- https://mezha.media/en/2022/04/18/the-worst-tanks-in-the-world-three-russian-tanks-are-in-top-5/
- https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/Russia/United-States/Military
- https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/traveladvisories/traveladvisories/russia-travel-advisory.html
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-34
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Russia
- https://a-z-animals.com/blog/what-are-the-oldest-cities-in-the-world/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Russia
- https://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/map/European-Russia-map.htm
- https://www.thefivecoatconsultinggroup.com/the-coronavirus-crisis/ukraine-context-d33
- https://www.mbc.org.br/canvs/links08216352.html
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico%E2%80%93Sweden_relations
- https://www.thoughtco.com/russian-nicknames-and-diminutives-1502309
- https://apnews.com/article/russia-poland-war-kaliningrad-map-811eb734576cc567051558372daa51cd
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_from_NATO
- https://bridgetomoscow.com/curious-fact-moscow-epithets
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Armed_Forces
- https://www.newsweek.com/russia-su-75-felon-jet-us-f-35-f-22-aircraft-ukraine-war-1772392
- https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_49212.htm
- https://www.ducksters.com/geography/country/russia_history_timeline.php
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_Rus%27,_Russia_and_Ruthenia
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_Air_Force
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Russia
- https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjbxw/202302/t20230227_11032025.html
- https://www.history.com/topics/middle-east/constantinople
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_and_the_United_Nations
- https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/russia-is-in-which-continent-1645772351-1
- https://worldoftanks.com/en/news/general-news/20-facts/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Member_states_of_NATO
- https://helpfulprofessor.com/russian-people-physical-characteristics/
- https://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/russia.htm
- https://www.volza.com/p/1121-basmati-rice/import/import-in-russia/
- https://defensebridge.com/article/pt-91-twardy-vs-other-main-battle-tanks-how-does-it-compare.html
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow,_Pennsylvania
- https://olympic.kz/en/page/respublika-kazakhstan
- https://www.wilsoncenter.org/video/mexico-china-economic-relationship-examining-licit-and-illicit-trade-practices
- https://www.legion.org/landingzone/251119/super-friends-americas-finest-allies
- https://www.eurasiantimes.com/russias-t-14-armata-a-tech-revolution-leopard-challenge/
- https://www.outono.net/elentir/2022/10/09/abramsx-general-dynamics-presents-the-replacement-for-the-m1-abrams-mbt/
- https://wisevoter.com/country-rankings/military-size-by-country/
- https://www.quora.com/Which-WWII-tank-can-destroy-a-M1-Abrams-tank
- https://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/asia.htm
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_losses_during_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russians
- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-russia-largest-country-world-michael-faith
- https://thediplomat.com/2015/06/the-worlds-deadliest-tank-not-as-deadly-as-putin-thinks/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico%E2%80%93United_States_relations
- https://www.mos.ru/en/news/item/81229073/
- https://www.operationmilitarykids.org/f16-vs-f18-top-10-differences-between-the-viper-super-hornet/
- https://www.jluggage.com/blog/world/is-mexico-in-nato/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coat_of_arms_of_Ukraine
- https://osgamers.com/frequently-asked-questions/can-tanks-survive-a-javelin-missile
- http://www2.harpercollege.edu/mhealy/latamer/midamer/mmmex5/mmmex5tx.htm
- https://www.gao.gov/assets/nsiad-92-94.pdf
- https://www.mofa.go.jp/region/latin/mexico/data.html
- https://www.quora.com/Which-weapons-can-destroy-an-M1-Abrams-tank-with-one-shot
- https://www.newsweek.com/russia-su35-comparison-f16-jets-ukraine-1788873
- https://www.mcislanguages.com/fatherland-vs-motherland-what-is-the-gender-of-your-country/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Russia,_London
- https://www.gale.com/intl/essays/peter-h-wilson-holy-roman-empire-eighteenth-century
- https://versedvaper.com/best-sub-ohm-tanks/
- https://uapost.us/en/blog/in-12th-century-the-land-is-first-mentioned-as-ukraine-russia-does-not-exist/
- https://tankmuseum.org/tank-nuts/tank-collection/t-72
- https://www.newsweek.com/abrams-tanks-russia-t72-ukraine-war-compared-1778090
- https://www.engineering.com/story/tank-tech-the-abrams-and-leopard-2-vs-russian-tanks
- https://osgamers.com/frequently-asked-questions/can-a-t-72-destroy-an-abrams
- https://en.as.com/latest_news/which-european-countries-are-not-part-of-nato-updated-list-of-members-and-non-members-n/
- https://www.cbsnews.com/news/nato-countries-maps-list-membership-requirements/
- https://www.ausa.org/articles/life-after-abrams-if-it-doesn%E2%80%99t-look-or-act-tank-it-still-may-be-tank-future
- https://earth.esa.int/web/earth-watching/image-of-the-week/content/-/article/moscow-russia/
- https://www.newsweek.com/what-us-leaving-nato-would-look-like-1812459
- https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/historic-meeting-us-japan-south-koreas-leaders-poised/story?id=102289964
- https://www.defensebridge.com/article/the-ultimate-showdown-t-72-vs-abrams.html
- https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_world-regional-geography-people-places-and-globalization/s06-russia.html
- https://www.britannica.com/place/Russia
- https://theculturetrip.com/europe/russia/articles/heres-why-russia-is-called-russia
- https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/mexico-trade-agreements
- https://www.studyiq.com/articles/nato-countries/
- https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/2663/moscow-russia
- https://www.eurasiantimes.com/us-abrams-significantly-outperforms-all-russian-tanks-puts-our-military/
- https://www.ramenclub.so/blog/rice-moscow-methods-prioritization-framework
- https://news.hofstede-insights.com/news/ask-an-expert-smile-in-russia
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guatemala%E2%80%93Mexico_relations
- https://www.army.cz/scripts/detail.php?id=11255
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Mutual_Cooperation_and_Security_between_the_United_States_and_Japan
- https://www.state.gov/u-s-relations-with-mexico/
- https://www.eurasiantimes.com/mig-21-vs-f-16-can-a-3rd-generation-mig-21-really-shoot-down-hi-tech-f-16-aircraft/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-72
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Navy
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_groups_in_Moscow
- https://central.asia-news.com/en_GB/articles/cnmi_ca/features/2023/06/20/feature-02
- https://www.quora.com/Is-it-possible-for-a-T-72-to-knock-out-an-M1A2-Abrams
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Dynamics_F-16_Fighting_Falcon_operational_history
- https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-politics-us-national-security-council-7b8475342e6d5e0ad6e45715fe5a1fd9
- https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2022/10/08/five-reasons-why-ukraine-wont-join-nato-any-time-soon
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/35th_Combined_Arms_Army
- https://www.quora.com/How-hard-is-it-to-destroy-an-Abrams-tank
- https://osgamers.com/frequently-asked-questions/what-is-the-most-feared-tank
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derbent
- https://www.rand.org/blog/2023/05/what-f-16s-will-and-wont-do-for-ukraine.html
- https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2023/03/12/the-russian-army-is-running-out-of-t-72-tanks-and-quickly/
- https://www.operationmilitarykids.org/best-fighter-jets-in-the-world/
- https://www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2023/01/31/abrams-is-the-best-main-battle-tank-in-the-world-but-improving-it-should-still-be-a-priority/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M1_Abrams
- https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/your-marine-corps/2021/03/22/goodbye-tanks-how-the-marine-corps-will-change-and-what-it-will-lose-by-ditching-its-armor/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TASS
- https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/37498491/world-cup-2018-russia-misadventures-trying-read-cyrillic
- https://www.britannica.com/place/Mexico/Trade
- https://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/map/mexico-administrative-map.htm
- https://www.securefreesociety.org/research/monitor28/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia
- https://geohistory.today/origins-of-russia-pt1/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico
- https://www.armyrecognition.com/defense_news_april_2023_global_security_army_industry/clash_of_titans_analyzing_us_m1a1_abrams_vs._russian_t-72_series_tanks_in_modern_combat.html
- https://usafacts.org/articles/what-is-nato-and-what-does-it-cost-to-be-a-member/
- https://www.businessinsider.com/russian-expert-says-tanks-may-have-disadvantages-against-abrams-tanks-2023-2
- https://nypost.com/2023/01/25/us-m1-abrams-vs-ukraines-t-72-tanks-heres-how-they-compare/
- https://homework.study.com/explanation/was-russia-part-of-the-roman-empire.html
- https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-07-05/shift-in-balance-of-arms-in-ukraine-underscored-by-fresh-data
- https://ctc.braganca.sp.gov.br/bootstrap/1090420
- https://asc.army.mil/web/portfolio-item/abrams-main-battle-tank/
- https://www.military.com/equipment/f-16-fighting-falcon
- https://steamcommunity.com/app/236390/discussions/0/1489987634010803126/?l=russian&ctp=3
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norilsk
- https://www.ias.edu/ideas/2006/bowersock-three-romes
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanks_of_Iraq
- https://www.mbc.org.br/canvs/0978542
- https://frontierindia.com/f-16-vs-su-35-battle-is-building-up-in-ukraine-here-are-some-of-each-planes-strengths-and-weaknesses/
- https://1997-2001.state.gov/regions/eur/fs_members.html
- https://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2016/02/17/lets-call-ukraine-by-its-proper-name/
- https://www.politico.com/news/2023/01/26/us-sends-ukraine-advanced-abrams-tanks-00079648
- https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2023/04/07/the-russians-arent-just-running-out-of-tanks-theyre-running-out-of-tank-crews-too-and-its-going-to-get-worse/
- https://americanexpatfinance.com/news/item/1105-surge-reported-in-number-of-americans-moving-to-live-in-mexico-in-2022
- https://www.britannica.com/event/Mexican-American-War
- https://www.rips.or.jp/en/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/RIPS_Policy_Perspectives_No.2.pdf
- https://www.expresstorussia.com/experience-russia/the-geography-of-russia.html
- https://www.jpost.com/international/article-745424
- https://www.eurasiantimes.com/new-mig-29-vs-f-16-ex-iaf-air-marshall-explains-why-fulcrums/
- https://www.globalfirepower.com/country-military-strength-detail.php?country_id=mexico
- https://familytreemagazine.com/heritage/russian/genealogy-white-russian/
- https://www.quora.com/Could-a-T-72-destroy-an-M1-Abrams